Haddock v. Nationwide Financial Services, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Nationwide may not bring an action for contribution or indemnification against the Trustees because “it is implausible that any entity other than Nationwide received direct monetary value from the mutual funds’ revenue sharing payments”
• stating that in Chemung, the Second Circuit “rejected the suggestion that it was creating a new right of action under ERISA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).