Skip to main content
· 1/25/1984

Hada v. Hada

Citations

  • 10 Ark. App. 281
  • 663 S.W.2d 203
  • 1984 Ark. App. LEXIS 1459

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that, as with Colorado River abstention, the factors are considered in the context of Brillhart, without mechanical application

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Agree, Cracraft, Glaze, Mayfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.