· 1/22/1986
Hackney v. Sheeskin
Citations
- 503 A.2d 1249
- 1986 D.C. App. LEXIS 267
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[discovery] delay could not ordinarily be considered prejudicial per se”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pryor, Rogers, Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.