Hackney v. Hackney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the divorce court could only assign the proceeds from a husband’s company “if the husband collects them”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• In re LaForce
  S.D. Alabama· 2017-09-06· cited 3×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hall v. Mazzone
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1986-03-21· cited 252×
• Ex Parte Brewington
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1983-12-16· cited 88×
• Willing v. Willing
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1995-02-10· cited 77×
• Welch v. Welch
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1994-03-11· cited 69×
• Hartzell v. Hartzell
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1993-04-02· cited 46×
• Lyons v. Lyons
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1976-12-08· cited 19×
• T.K.T. v. F.P.T.
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1998-02-06· cited 18×
• Etheredge v. Etheredge
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1999-03-12· cited 7×