Hackin v. First National Bank of Arizona, Phoenix

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a party who willfully or negligently fails to keep in touch with counsel cannot complain of the court proceeding in his absence
• recognizing a client “is bound by the knowledge of his attorney”
• where client fails to keep in touch with attorney, client cannot complain because he did not know trial date
• where client fails to keep in touch with attorney, client cannot complain because he did not know trial date
• “We recognize that where a client wil[l]fully or negligently fails to keep in touch with an attorney so that the attorney cannot properly inform him as to the pending litigation that he cannot complain because he does not realize the date of the trial.”
• “We recognize that where a client wil[l]fully or negligently fails to keep in touch with an attorney so that the attorney cannot properly inform him as to the pending litigation that he cannot complain because he does not realize the date of the trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).