Skip to main content
· 10/17/1973

Hackey v. State

Citations

  • 500 S.W.2d 520
  • 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1948

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because no one objected to the court assessing punishment it is presumed they agreed to it
  • holding that absent an objection, appellate court will presume that defendant agreed that trial judge should assess punishment
  • holding that when court assesses punishment without objection from defendant, it is presumed that defendant agreed that court assess punishment, even if defendant had previously filed election for jury to assess punishment
  • absent an objection, appellate court will presume that defendant agreed that trial judge should assess punishment
  • absent an objection, appellate court will presume that defendant agreed that trial judge should assess punishment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.