Hackett v. Conn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court’s determination that the plaintiff had not demonstrated a substantial chance of award when its “argument rest[ed] on mere numerical possibility, not evidence”
• affirming the trial court’s determination that the plaintiff had not demonstrated a substantial chance of award because its “argument rest[ed] on mere numerical possibility, not evidence”
• affirming the trial court’s determination that the plaintiff had not 8 demonstrated a substantial chance of award when its “argument rest[ed] on mere numerical possibility, not evidence”
• finding “no evidence on which to base a finding that [the] plaintiff had not only a chance to receive the award, but a substantial chance” when the plaintiff’s success would leave a higher- rated, lower-cost alternative offer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).