Skip to main content
· 7/21/1994

Hackel v. Federal Deposit Insurance

Citations

  • 858 F. Supp. 289
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10120
  • 1994 WL 383185

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • four and one-half months between appointment and disaffirmance held to be reasonable where plaintiff failed to introduce evidence to show that said period of time was unreasonable under the circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.