Hach v. Hill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that trial court has discretion to deny amendment introducing new cause of action or calling for substantially different evidence
• determining that “[t]o allow the plaintiff to amend his writ” to add an invasion of privacy claim “after the statute of limitations had run would unfairly prejudice the defendants”
• finding trial court’s denial of motion to amend “after the statute of limitations had run” sustainable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).