Habhab v. Hon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the plaintiff did not allege facts that shocked the conscience where the plaintiff alleged the officers interfered with his towing business because of ethnic prejudice
• concluding -7- the plaintiff did not allege facts that shocked the conscience where the plaintiff alleged the officers interfered with his towing business because of ethnic prejudice
• there is no need to analyze the second prong of the qualified immunity analysis if the facts alleged do not amount to a constitutional violation
• “[i]f the allegations and undisputed facts do not amount to a constitutional violation, there is no necessity for further inquiries concerning qualified immunity.”
• “If the allegations and undisputed facts do not amount to a constitutional violation, ‘there is no necessity for further inquiries concerning qualified immunity.’” (quoting Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 201 (2001))
• absent facts showing a meeting of the minds, a conspiracy claim fails

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).