Habershaw v. Michaels Stores, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a mere allegation that retailer's floor was \shiny\ was insufficient to support a negligence claim arising out of customer's slip and fall because it was not competent evidence
• deposition testimony by the plaintiff that the floor where she slipped and fell was \shiny\ was not \competent evidence of defendant's negligence and plaintiff's allegation [was] nothing more than conjecture or speculation\
• deposition testimony by the plaintiff that the floor where she slipped and fell was “shiny” was not “competent evidence of defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s allegation [was] nothing more than conjecture or speculation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).