Haberman v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the dangers in the copyright context of evaluating the merit of a publication
• noting the dangers in the copyright context of evaluating the merit of a publication
• “[I]t has long been recognized that a commentator may fairly reproduce as much of the original, copyrighted work as is necessary to his proper purpose.”
• chapter 93A action predicated upon misrepresentation in a magazine sold before July, 1983 governed by interstate commerce exemption
• reproduction of surrealistic art in magazine, where creativity counted against fair use finding
• for purposes of commentary on copyrighted photographs, full reproduction was appropriate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).