Haberkorn v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a non-lawyer may not represent his or her spouse in a court of law
• holding that a husband who is not a member of the bar may not represent his wife in a court of law. “This is true whether her interest be separate or community.”
• holding person not admitted to practice law in Arizona may not represent another individual
• holding non-lawyer husband not permitted to represent wife in court
• non-lawyer husband may not represent wife in a court of law, despite any community interest
• non-lawyer husband may not represent wife in a court of law, despite any community interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).