Haberern v. Kaupp Vascular Surgeons Ltd. Defined Benefit Pension Plan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that § 510 is “limited to actions affecting the employer-employee relationship”
• \We start our discussion ... [concerning 29 U.S.C. § 1132 (c)(1) ] by pointing out that statutory penalty provisions are construed strictly.\
• \protects plan participants from termination motivated by an employ- 28 er's desire to prevent a pension from vesting\
• “[A]n employer is free to develop an employee benefit plan as it wishes because when it does so it makes a corporate management decision, unrestricted by ERISA’s fiduciary duties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).