Haberer v. Woodbury County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an “employee cannot simply quit and sue, claiming he or she was constructively discharged”
• finding no constructive discharge when the plaintiff was placed on 18 months of paid administrative leave and a 30-day unpaid suspension while criminal charges were being investigated against him
• noting “a constructive discharge alleges the loss of employment attributable to the actions of an employer” and so “such a discharge is included in the term ‘removal’”
• denying recovery based in part on employee’s “rash and intemperate” act of resigning
• denying recovery based in part on employee’s “rash and intemperate” act of resigning
• denying recovery based in part on employee’s “rash and intemperate” act of resigning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).