Haber v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing principle in regard to issue concerning whether subsequent rule 3.850 motion was timely
• “Because Mr. Haber’s judgment and sentence apparently never became final, Mr. Haber’s rule 3.850 motion was premature. See Brigham v. State, 950 So.2d 1274, 1276 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). Therefore, the circuit court should have dismissed rather than denied the motion. Id”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).