Haber v. Biomet, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying § 13 in holding that an interlocutory arbitrability ruling was preclusive under state law
• applying Indiana issue preclusion doctrine, which required, inter alia, that “the judgment in the former suit was rendered on the merits”
• “When an arbitration clause in a contract includes a forum selection clause, only the district court in that forum can issue a Section 4 order compelling arbitration.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).