Haas v. New Orleans Rys. Co.
Citations
- 112 La. 747
- 36 So. 670
- 1904 La. LEXIS 458
Syllabus
<p>STREET RAILWAYS — PERSONAL INJURIES — NEGLIGENCE — DUTY OF HOTONEER — EVIDENCE— SUFFICIENCY.</p> <p>1. In a case sounding- in damages growing out of a collision between an electric car and a float, the crowded street rendered it -necessary to be more than usually careful.</p> <p>2. It devolved upon the fioatman not to attempt to cross in face of danger, and the moConeer to hold his car under control so as to be able to stop within the shortest possible distance. The failure was with the latter.</p> <p>3. The court carefully examined the testimony, and, after consideration, concluded that the weight of the testimony was with plaintiff, and affirmed the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the district court.</p> <p>On Rehearing.</p> <p>4.The amount allowed by the verdict was reduced, as will be seen by consulting the decree.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the existence of a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan “generally rebuts an inference of scienter and supports the reasonable inference that stock sales were pre-scheduled and not suspicious.”
- unchallenged documents include “Form 4s” in motion to dismiss record
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breaux
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.