Haas v. McDonald's Restaurants of Ohio
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 744
Syllabus
The Ohio Supreme Court has held that \[a]n occupier of premises is under no duty to protect a business invitee against dangers which are known to such invitee or are so obvious and apparent to such invitee that he may reasonably be expected to discover them and protect himself against them.\
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \the defendant's concern that the weapon could be traced to her ... evidenced consciousness of guilt\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Willamowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.