Haas v. Haas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the trial court, in determining visitation, “is not bound by any agreement between parents and should not follow such an agreement if it is not in the child’s best interests to do so”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ross v. Botha
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-03· cited 27×
• Knipe v. Knipe
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-19· cited 9×
• Worthington v. MacGregor
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-11-01· cited 2×
• Shaw v. Shaw
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2002-04-18· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McAlister v. Shaver
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-04· cited 16×
• McGlamry v. McGlamry
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-18· cited 15×
• Jones v. Jones
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-19· cited 11×
• Purvis v. Carver
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-01-30· cited 3×