Haas Investment Co. v. Robert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is incumbent upon us, in 94 this case as in any other, to eschew appellate fact-finding . . . .”
• “It is incumbent upon us, in this case as in any other, to eschew appellate fact-finding and to avoid usurping the function of the trial court.”
• “It is incumbent upon us, in this case as in any other, to eschew appellate fact-finding and to avoid usurping the function of the trial court.”
• “It is incumbent upon us, in this case as in any other, to eschew appellate fact-finding and to avoid usurping the function of the trial court.”
• “It is incumbent upon us, in this case as in any other, to eschew appellate fact-finding and to avoid usurping the function of the trial court.”
• “It is incumbent upon us, in this case as in any other, to eschew appellate fact-finding, and to avoid usurping the function of the trial court.” (internal citation and quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).