Skip to main content
· 11/24/1925

Haas Bros. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 3 B.T.A. 113
  • 1925 BTA LEXIS 2022

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • striving to interpret provisions of the King County Code to be “consistent with our case law applying the nonconforming use doctrine” (emphasis added)
  • reiterating that legal questions “are reviewed de novo”
  • reiterating that legal questions \ are reviewed de novo. \
  • commonly known as, and hereinafter, “Shear”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phillips, Geaupner, Trammell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.