Häagen-Dazs, Inc. v. Frusen Glädjé Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction against defendant for deceptive trade practices because plaintiff was engaged in the same deceptive misconduct
• “The names in issue, Haagen-Dazs and Frusen Gladjee, are clearly distinguishable. . . . [B]oth names contain two words to identify an ice cream product, but so do the names ‘Louis Sherry’ and ‘Dolly Madison.’”
• discussing nexus in a copyright infringement claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).