Skip to main content
· 4/3/2007

Haag v. United States

Citations

  • 485 F.3d 1
  • 362 B.R. 1
  • 99 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1986
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 7612
  • 2007 WL 969536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding computerized records of letters giving notice of tax liens admissible
  • an affidavit describing an office’s usual practice was “enough to infer what actually happened” where the affiant did not have personal knowledge
  • “[S]ubstandard care, malpractice, negligence, inadvertent failure to provide care, and disagreement as to the appropriate course of treatment are all insufficient to prove a constitutional violation.”
  • “[S]ubstandard care, malpractice, negligence, inadvertent failure to provide care, and disagreement as to the appropriate course of treatment are all insufficient to prove a 12 constitutional violation.”
  • a purported lack of memory about a fact is not affirmative evidence that the event did not occur and, therefore, it is insufficient to render that fact “genuinely disputed”
  • a purported lack of memory about a fact is not affirmative evidence that the event did not occur and, therefore, it is insufficient to render that fact “genuinely disputed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Campbell, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.