Skip to main content
· 7/29/1898

Haag v. Good

Citations

  • 7 Pa. Super. 425
  • 1898 Pa. Super. LEXIS 320

Syllabus

<p>Beneficial society — Refusal of relief — Application to courts of equity.</p> <p>While the law requives a member of a beneficial order first to exhaust his remedies in the courts provided by the rules of the order, yet when a member is denied a hearing, contrary to the fundamental law of the organization, such member is rectus in curia in applying to the courts of his state. Relief will be afforded by the courts only so far and from such date as compliance by the plaintiff member with the rules of his chamber establish a legal standing to appeal to the courts on refusal by the society of an adequate hearing.</p> <p>Appeals — Practice, Superior Court — Defective assignment — Rules of court.</p> <p>If any assignment embraces more than one point, or refers to more than one bill of exception, or raises more than one distinct question, it will be considered a waiver of all the errors so alleged; such assignment violates Rule XV. and cannot be considered. The assignment in question assigned for error the entire decree of the court which was complex in its nature and separable in its directions.</p>

Judges: Beaver, Orlady, Porter, Rice, Smith, Wickham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.