Skip to main content
· 9/1/2004

Haag v. Barnhart

Citations

  • 333 F. Supp. 2d 1210
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17952
  • 2004 WL 1961664

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding it unreasonable for ALJ to reject consulting psychologist’s opinion “based upon the lack of a diagnosis or notation of mental illness by her medical doctors who saw her for specific physical problems”
  • “An ALJ is not allowed to make medical findings or indulge in unfounded hunches about the claimant’s medical condition or prospect for improvement.”
  • “An ALJ is not allowed to make medical findings or indulge in unfounded hunches about the claimant’s medical condition or prospect for improvement.”
  • “[I]t was unreasonable to reject [psychiatrist’s] opinions based upon the lack of a diagnosis or notation of mental illness by her medical doctors who saw her for specific physical problems.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.