· 12/10/1895
H. W. Chandler Commission Co. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.
Citations
- 64 Mo. App. 144
- 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 528
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that \[t]he fact that a cooperating witness avoided a mandatory minimum sentence is critical information that a defendant must be allowed to present to the jury\
- finding a Confrontation Clause error was not harmless when the circuit court disallowed the defendant from questioning his co-conspirators about the possible mandatory minimum sentences they avoided by testifying for the State because the case relied exclusively on their credibility
- \A violation of the * Confrontation Clause is not per se reversible but is subject to a harmless error analysis.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Biggs
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.