Skip to main content
· 12/10/1895

H. W. Chandler Commission Co. v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.

Citations

  • 64 Mo. App. 144
  • 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 528

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that \[t]he fact that a cooperating witness avoided a mandatory minimum sentence is critical information that a defendant must be allowed to present to the jury\
  • finding a Confrontation Clause error was not harmless when the circuit court disallowed the defendant from questioning his co-conspirators about the possible mandatory minimum sentences they avoided by testifying for the State because the case relied exclusively on their credibility
  • \A violation of the * Confrontation Clause is not per se reversible but is subject to a harmless error analysis.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Biggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.