H. T. Cottam & Co. v. Currie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding home offices as “place of the defendant” when its employees had products and small centrifuges in their homes
• holding 15 that the home offices of employees are a physical place in the district because all the company’s 16 employees work from home
• observing that because all employees of the defendant worked from home, their home offices constituted a primary physical location for the defendant's business
• holding home offices as “place of the defendant” when its employees had products and small centrifuges in their homes
• observing that because all employees of the defendant worked from home, their home offices constituted a primary physical location for the defendant's business
• stressing that the “employees did not merely possess [sales kits]—their use in New York was part of each employee’s job description”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).