Skip to main content
· 12/14/1883

H. & T. C. R'y Co. v. Pinto

Citations

  • 60 Tex. 516
  • 1883 Tex. LEXIS 368

Syllabus

<p>1. Kailway company—Fact case.—See statement and opinion for facts testified to, conflicting in their character, under which the court refused to disturb a verdict in favor of a brakeman, against a railway company, for §5,000 damages, caused by the brakeman’s hand being crushed, through the negligence of the company in leaving a ditch unfilled, across which the brakeman was required to work in coupling cars.</p>

Judges: App, Com, Delany

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.