Skip to main content
· 4/4/1968

H. Max Ammerman v. City Stores Company

Citations

  • 394 F.2d 950
  • 38 A.L.R. 3d 1042
  • 129 U.S. App. D.C. 322
  • 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7456

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • promissory estoppel; plaintiff’s justifiable reliance on an agent’s promise estops latter from asserting statutory bar
  • “rental and terms at least equal to that of any other major department store in the center.”
  • “An option is more than an offer ... it is itself a contract and is not to be confused with the bilateral contract which it gives the optionee the power to bring into being.”
  • \An option is more than an offer . . . it is itself a contract and is not to be confused with the bilateral contract which it gives the optionee the power to bring into being.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Danaher, Tamm, Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.