H. K. Porter Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “Goodyear has not cited, and we have not found, any cases dealing with the right to post-judgment discovery.”
• holding parties seeking to avoid judgment on the basis of Rule 60(b)(3) ordinarily are required to make a prima facie showing of fraud in order to be entitled to discovery after judgment
• stating “it is well within his discretion to require the moving party to make a showing in support of its allegations before requiring the prevailing party to submit a second time to extensive discovery.”
• “an experienced trial judge ... [is] in the best position to know” whether fraud has been perpetrated on his or her court
• allegations of nondisclosure during pretrial discovery are not sufficient to support an action for fraud on the court
• “Allegations of nondisclosure during pretrial discovery are not sufficient to support an action for fraud on the court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).