Skip to main content
· 9/18/1945

H. J. Heinz Co. v. United States

Citations

  • 15 Cust. Ct. 426
  • 1945 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1062

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting state’s concession that an officer violated the defendant’s right to counsel when, during an interrogation about uncharged crimes, the officer asked the defendant about charged crimes on which the defendant had counsel
  • suppressing “other crimes” evidence as to those crimes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kincheloe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.