· 9/18/1945
H. J. Heinz Co. v. United States
Citations
- 15 Cust. Ct. 426
- 1945 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1062
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting state’s concession that an officer violated the defendant’s right to counsel when, during an interrogation about uncharged crimes, the officer asked the defendant about charged crimes on which the defendant had counsel
- suppressing “other crimes” evidence as to those crimes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kincheloe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.