Skip to main content
· 6/1/1988

H & H Plumbing Co. v. Industrial Commission

Citations

  • 525 N.E.2d 155
  • 170 Ill. App. 3d 706
  • 121 Ill. Dec. 349
  • 1988 Ill. App. LEXIS 820

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a current employer’s argument that it was not liable under the Act where the current employer failed to present evidence of the employee’s exposure after his employment with the current employer
  • rejecting a current employer’s argument that it was not liable under the Act where the current employer failed to present evidence of the employee’s exposure after his employment with the current employer
  • employee who was exposed to asbestos in the workplace as a pipefitter recovered under the Workers’ Occupational Diseases Act for his lung disease
  • employee who was exposed to asbestos in the workplace as a pipefitter recovered under the Workers’ Occupational Diseases Act for his lung disease
  • “the problem in Thermos was not determining which employer was liable under the Act”
  • “the problem in Thermos was not determining which employer was liable under the Act”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Calvo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.