· 6/1/1988
H & H Plumbing Co. v. Industrial Commission
Citations
- 525 N.E.2d 155
- 170 Ill. App. 3d 706
- 121 Ill. Dec. 349
- 1988 Ill. App. LEXIS 820
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting a current employer’s argument that it was not liable under the Act where the current employer failed to present evidence of the employee’s exposure after his employment with the current employer
- rejecting a current employer’s argument that it was not liable under the Act where the current employer failed to present evidence of the employee’s exposure after his employment with the current employer
- employee who was exposed to asbestos in the workplace as a pipefitter recovered under the Workers’ Occupational Diseases Act for his lung disease
- employee who was exposed to asbestos in the workplace as a pipefitter recovered under the Workers’ Occupational Diseases Act for his lung disease
- “the problem in Thermos was not determining which employer was liable under the Act”
- “the problem in Thermos was not determining which employer was liable under the Act”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Calvo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.