H. G. Hill Realty Company, L.L.C. v. Re/Max Carriage House, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no basis for concluding the appellant’s actions were not willful because he failed to show they were not willful
• holding that, when a defaulting party did not dispute certificates of service and failed to meet his “burden to show that his failure to answer was not willful,” the trial court did not err in denying Rule 60 relief
• explaining that an amended complaint “supersedes and destroys the original complaint as a pleading”
• ―The most common factors used by Tennessee courts to determine whether to pierce the corporate veil were originally set forth in [Allen].‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).