Skip to main content
· 1/15/1887

H. D. Forbes & Bro. v. Porter

Citations

  • 23 Fla. 47

Syllabus

<p>1. The identification in an appeal bond of the judgment appealed from is sufficient, if it is certain, even though it be inartificial.</p> <p>2. No appeal lies from an order refusing to dissolve an attachment.</p> <p>8. Where exceptions are taken upon the trial of an issue of fact before a jury in an attachment proceeding, the hill of exceptions may be settled as in other cases and filed, hut no appeal can be t iken from an order refusing to dissolve the attachment until there has been final judgment for the plaintiff upon the claim or demand which the attachment was levied to secure.</p>

Judges: Raney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.