Skip to main content
· 4/30/1928

H. D. Conkey & Co. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 11 B.T.A. 888
  • 1928 BTA LEXIS 3694

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the district court’s task was more than ministerial where it had yet to determine the amount of damages
  • noting that Rule 59(e) “has a 28-day time limit and is reserved for final judgments”
  • noting that Rule 59(e) “has a 28-day time limit and is reserved for final judgments”
  • stating that the district court’s order granting summary judgment was not final where it determined liability and ordered the parties to file a motion to determine the damages amount
  • stating that the district court’s order granting summary judgment was not final where it determined liability and ordered the parties to file a motion to determine the damages amount
  • stating that the district court’s order granting summary judgment was not final where it determined liability and ordered the parties to file a motion to determine the damages amount

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Love

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.