H. A. Friend & Co. v. Professional Stationery, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the state offered sufficient evidence of the defendant’s intent to commit theft
• confirming that the misappropriation of funds belonging to another constitutes conversion
• listing \intentional control or taking of property belonging to another\ as the first element of conversion
• listing “intentional control or tak- ing of property belonging to another” as the first element of conversion
• “Van Der Puy had a duty, regardless of the existence of the contract, not to retain or use money that belonged to Friend without Friend’s consent or authoriza- tion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).