Gyro Brass Manufacturing Corp. v. United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• testimony about oral modification of sales agreement was admissible nonhearsay because testimony was being offered to prove only that utterance was made, not for truth of any statements within utterance
• testimony about oral modification of sales agreement was admissible nonhearsay because testimony was being offered to prove only that utterance was made, not for truth of any statements within utterance
• testimony as to the content of a conversation was admissible as nonhearsay proof of an oral contract modification
• testimony of the contents of an utterance, offered only to prove that it was made
• testimony about oral modification of sales agreement was admissible nonhearsay because testimony was being offered to prove only that utterance was made, not for truth of any statements within utterance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).