· 11/26/1975
Gwinn v. Kane
Citations
- 348 A.2d 900
- 465 Pa. 269
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reviewing court may affirm a correct ruling based upon an alternate legal theory from that employed by the trial court
- reviewing court may affirm a correct ruling based upon an alternate legal theory from that employed by the trial court
- characterizing portions of Smith as dicta, including its suggestion that the office of special prosecutor could not be constitutionally sanctioned
- characterizing portions of Smith as dicta, including its suggestion that the office of special prosecutor could not be constitutionally sanctioned
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.