Skip to main content
· 11/26/1975

Gwinn v. Kane

Citations

  • 348 A.2d 900
  • 465 Pa. 269

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing court may affirm a correct ruling based upon an alternate legal theory from that employed by the trial court
  • reviewing court may affirm a correct ruling based upon an alternate legal theory from that employed by the trial court
  • characterizing portions of Smith as dicta, including its suggestion that the office of special prosecutor could not be constitutionally sanctioned
  • characterizing portions of Smith as dicta, including its suggestion that the office of special prosecutor could not be constitutionally sanctioned

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.