Gvozdenovic v. United Air Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that flight attendants manifested a clear intention to arbitrate by sending a representative to act on their behalf in arbitration process
• explaining that a party may be compelled to participate in arbitration if its conduct indicates that it clearly intended to arbitrate
• concluding that a nonsignatory “manifested a clear intent” to arbitrate because, in part, nonsignatory did not, at any point before or during the arbitration, object to the process, refuse to arbitrate, or make any attempt to seek judicial relief
• finding a “clear intent to arbitrate” on behalf of party who “chose [and paid for] a committee to represent them in the arbitration”
• finding intent for a nonsignatory to arbitrate where the party made no objections to the arbitration proceeding, participated in the arbitration, and failed to seek judicial intervention to halt the arbitration
• corporate veil is pierced where, among other things, parent and subsidiary 1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).