Guzzo v. Cristofano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an 10 ʺessentially factualʺ component of mixed question of fact and law is subject to review for clear error (internal quotation marks omitted)
• defining habitual residence as “the place where [a child] usually or customarily lives” (emphasis added)
• “essentially factu al” component of mixed question of law and fact reviewed for clear error
• “Although parents cannot stipulate to habitual residency, . . . courts have widely considered parental intent as one of the relevant factors[.]” (citing cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).