Texas Supreme Court· 12/31/1992
Guzman v. Guzman
Citations
- 843 S.W.2d 486
- 36 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 434
- 1992 Tex. LEXIS 191
- 1992 WL 387415
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the court = s reasons for its judgment were apparent when appellant = s complaint addressed only one issue and raised only one dispute
- holding trial court's reason for its judgment was apparent when appellant's complaint addressed only one issue and, as to that issue, there was only one dispute
- legitimate argument for change in existing law permissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court· 1997-07-09· cited 383×
- Grossnickle v. GrossnickleTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1996-10-10· cited 115×
- Ramirez v. Transcontinental Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1994-07-21· cited 32×
- Provident American Insurance Co. v. CastanedaTex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1996-02-14· cited 18×
- Kirschberg v. LoweTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1998-06-30· cited 14×
- Klein Associates Political Relations v. Port Arthur Independent School DistrictTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2002-12-19
- Switzer Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Siv Houa ChungTex. App. Ct., 12th Dist. (Tyler)· 2002-10-02
- Rafael D. Alvarado, Et Ux. v. R. A. Alvarado, Alfonso Ibanez and Gloria IbanezTex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-05-30
- J.R.'s Landscaping & Sprinkler Systems, Inc. v. City of CrosbytonTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2014-11-21
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.