Guzman v. Cordero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that it was possible the employee owed an independent duty of care because the employee personally inspected tires that allegedly caused the plaintiff’s injuries
• remanding the case to state court in an improper joinder analysis where the employee “was directly and personally involved in conduct that allegedly caused Plaintiff's injuries.”
• finding a possible breach of an independent duty of care by an employee when he was personally involved in providing allegedly negligent inspection services to the plaintiff
• finding a possible breach of an independent duty of care by an employee when he was personally involved in providing allegedly negligent inspection services to the plaintiff
• “Unlike the individual defendants in Leitch, Cordero was directly and personally involved in conduct that allegedly caused Plaintiff's injuries... .”
• “Unlike the individual defendants in Leitch, Cordero was directly and personally involved in conduct that allegedly caused Plaintiff’s injuries because Cordero actually performed the services in question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).