Guzman v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Unless the plain meaning of the statute requires it, we will not expand or limit its meaning”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. Magnus M.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2012-02-06· cited 25×
• Irwin v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-07-15· cited 23×
• Renaud v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2015-04-17· cited 12×
• Amato v. District Attorney for Cape & Islands District
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2011-08-25· cited 9×
• Riley v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2012-07-20· cited 5×
• Santana v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2016-09-30· cited 1×
• Peterson v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2017-11-29
• Silva-Santiago v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2014-05-22
• Kiley v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Superior Court· 2012-06-11
• Madrigal v. Hyundai Motor America
  California Court of Appeal· 2023-04-11
• Madrigal v. Hyundai Motor America
  California Court of Appeal· 2023-05-09
• Cruz v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Appeals Court· 2023-06-07
• Roberto Cruz v. Commonwealth
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2024-10-16