· 10/1/1985
Guyther v. Hebb (In Re Hebb)
Citations
- 53 B.R. 1003
- 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15388
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding denial of motion to convert from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7 is interlocutory
- finding that the denial of a motion to dismiss “is clearly interlocutory in nature”
- finding that the denial of motion to dismiss “is clearly interlocutory in nature”
- finding that the denial of motion to dismiss “is clearly interlocutory in nature”
- finding that the denial of motion to dismiss “is clearly interlocutory in nature”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Northrop
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.