Skip to main content
· 10/1/1985

Guyther v. Hebb (In Re Hebb)

Citations

  • 53 B.R. 1003
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding denial of motion to convert from Chapter 11 to Chapter 7 is interlocutory
  • finding that the denial of a motion to dismiss “is clearly interlocutory in nature”
  • finding that the denial of motion to dismiss “is clearly interlocutory in nature”
  • finding that the denial of motion to dismiss “is clearly interlocutory in nature”
  • finding that the denial of motion to dismiss “is clearly interlocutory in nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Northrop

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.