Guyman v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the lien is not provided as a penalty, but rather as security”
• interest allowed on money due on contract from date work completed, reversing allowance only from date of verdict
• “interest will be allowed even though the claim is unliquidated ‘where the amount due can be readily ascertained by mere computation, or by a legal or recognized standard.’”
• cited approvingly in Mitchell v. Flandro, supra, and Farm Development Corp. v. Hernandez, supra
• “interest will be allowed even though the claim is unliquidated ‘where the amount due can be readily ascertained by mere computation, or by a legal or recognized standard.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).