Guy v. Vilsack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a change in child’s placement alone is not sufficient to warrant a change in disposition
• holding juvenile court lacked authority to order child protection agency to comply with federal Adoption Assistance Act provision requiring periodic administrative reviews in context of protective-order hearing
• “The juvenile court’s decision will stand on appellate review unless the record indicates that the court exercised its discretion for clearly untenable reasons or to an extent clearly unreasonable.”
• \The juvenile court's decision will stand on appellate review unless the record indicates that the court exercised its discretion for clearly untenable reasons or to an extent clearly unreasonable.\
• statute governing juvenile procedures “allocates power between the legal custodian and the juvenile court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).