Guy v. Town of Temple

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that pre- existing, non-conforming uses “may be continued indefinitely” under ordinance
• “[T]he interpretation of a tribunal’s order presents a question of law, which we review de novo.”
• remand required because ZBA did not make findings regarding whether petitioner had unlawfully expanded his junkyard operations, let alone the character, nature, scope or effect on the surrounding neighborhood of the purported expansion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).