Guy v. State of Illinois

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing intentional infliction of emotional distress claim as preempted by the IHRA, but only citing the Rule 12(b)(6) standard
• “To rise to constitutional dimensions, the defamation must not only cause plaintiff a reputational injury, but also the deprivation of a liberty or property interest.”
• “Illinois state courts (and federal courts sitting in their stead) lack jurisdiction over [IHRA] claims, which proceed instead in front of the Illinois Human Rights Commission.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).