Guy Lewis, Jr. v. United States Postal Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a premature Rule 59 motion which was filed 14 “after the district court’s oral announcement of its decision but before there was a written order or 15 separate entry of judgment” is not ineffective
• holding that a premature 18 Rule 59 motion which was filed “after the district court’s oral announcement of its decision but 19 before there was a written order or separate entry of judgment” is not ineffective
• motion to reconsider pursuant to Rule 59(e) was timely when filed before the entry of judgment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).